I am interested in building more new rental units with alternative energy features that will produce rental income and residual income from energy systems.

It seems when it comes down to it, the S7 produces better quality images and videos.

It wouldn't produce cash flow, but it should lower what I'm paying in rent (other tenants subsidizing my rent), while *hopefully* building some equity through appreciation.Is this a crazy strategy? 

Or do they give up at some point when the house isn't producing any leads?  

Second, when we do get that big rise in values here in McKinney, I figure we can always sell the McKinney house, build a smaller house that reflects our kids moving out (I've almost got both out the door- hopefully this year they'll be producing on their own) and the overall desire I think many of us get to simply and downsize as we get older. 

I want to make sure they are producing quality leads before purchasing.

I’m in the housing business and that’s all I can handle at this time I shall always be grateful to those people who sold me on the proposition that investing in income producing real estate was truly a solid and proven pathway that leads to financial independence.

A 3-4plex would produce a profit 1000-1200 a month not your 600.Also, these are other reasons as why I recommend to walk away. 

I then explain my philosophy of quality over quantity, risk adjusted returns, total profitability (of which cash flow is only a very small slice) and wanting the FEWEST number of units (not the most) to produce sufficient cash flow to cover my living expenses on assets that are most likely to appreciate in value over time ... beyond that, mo' units = mo' problems.

There are many top producers that have teams and when you join a team you actually learn at least part of the business and you get paid for your efforts. .and if its investment grade properties you want to work in then look at commercial brokerages go interview with them see whats required.