Had he paid $80k that would have been the fair market he would have had a loan at a much higher rate than I charged due to his poor credit.

She had to take a copy of the lease to the water/sewer company and fill out an application when she moved in.

A previous applicant was approved but backed out because of financial problems, I was told.

I would appreciate confirmations that this is how it should go for 2008 tax purposes.If I have no luck finding tenants in late 2009 (hope that isn't the case), I wonder if I could rent the home to relatives at a fair market rent (same as I would charge any tenants) and still do my taxes as I would with any tenants?

How can this manufactured crisis be endlessly debated by the people that were in charge without a single person losing their liberty or their life for these egregious actions against the entire country?

http://www.armandomontelongo.com/news/?p=104#respond

[POST REMOVED BY ADMIN]

I would charge him about $950 for rent with a small cash flow in my pocket.

I asked him how much he charges and he told me what ever is fair, I'm suppose to pick it.

Buyers may sue a seller who violates this provision for an amount equal to three times all charges made for the title insurance.

However, when the unit is vacant, and there is no water usage attributed to the rental unit, then you can only take half of the "base" charge as a rental expense.