You should have reserves and more reserves as number of properties increases.

The reason being you would either not qualify for good financing or you would feel uncomfortable with the monthly holding costs/reserves need for the property.

There are only a handful of lenders that do such non-recourse loans for IRA owned properties, with First Western Federal Savings and North American Savings Bank being at the forefront.If one of these banks will not lend or at least not on terms that suit your needs, you would need to seek out a private party to act as lender. 

Either band can connect you at higher speeds than that.To answer the original post, there is no real benefit to reserving a band for your smart TV.

A smaller bank will do most everything they can to lend to you because of their local ties and federal lending institution requirements." 

For example, its usually a good idea to have cash reserves. 

With the extra rental income and my personal extra income I save towards a lump reserves fund on the property let’s say figuratively $20k.

The major difference in the numbers is based on new reserve requirement from the lender.

Reserves are more important.

I don’t hear bigger pockets touch to much on how much reserves if any you should have in you’re savings for the inevitable fix on a rental property .