Most have to do with continual communication, transparency, pre-approval thresholds, and accountability standards.One note, as a long distance investor, you will almost certainly not be able to get local bank financing.

At Staples, they are cheap to buy, maybe a buck or two, and they have a clip to attach to either a collar or shirt pocket, with transparent plastic surrounding the name inserted on paper; Staples also sells ones that have an elastic lanyard to be worn around the neck.

In other words, be as informative and transparent as possible.

I want the process to be very transparent so that my partner won't have any doubts that I cheated him in determining appreciation profits.Thanks for any comments!

To structure it any other way would seem to miss the point entirely.Kama Ward- If I hear what you're saying correctly, it is that the biggest problem with raising funds in this manner is the accountability and transparency with which you must utilize any funds raised.

What I look for when working with them is communication and transparency, if you accomplish that you are one of a kind in the business.

Dude, your talking yourself out of the deal already, lol.I say jump in, be transparent with everyone, and listen to the experts above, while your executing the deal!

As far as not being able to get below market value, well that's true, but as I expect appreciation to occur, in a year or three I will have made up for the net-loss up front, and over time hopfully the newer materials, mechanicals, and transparency of the house (e..g, no furniture to get in the way of inspections) will pay dividends in the bottom line.

Obama's aides criticize outgoing Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson's approach to rescues as lacking transparency and not doing enough to get credit flowing though the economy.

It's a complete and very transparent course.