There was a time where we had foreigners come and have a 3 day party with all excess that you can possibly imagine.

Since most owners won't accept pets because the fees or deposit won't cover the damage, this is a great way to incentivize Landlords to accept pets with the PM taking responsibility for the damage and it also creates an income stream for the PM.Your PM is keeping the fees and then offering to return the fees if there is damage in excess of the deposit.

However, finding a good MFH deal is more difficult than finding a good SFH deal with the latter in greater supply therefore excess demand doesn't drive up pricing too much.

Joe Kaiser acquired many properties via subject to, then sold them pocketing the excess proceeds instead of turning them to the homeowners. 

If the system overproduces the excess goes to the grid and comes back to me as a credit from the local utility.

My STRs are less than 2 hour drive from current population in excess of 20 million (not sure of population at GR).  

If you're in a better situation, and have excess capital, I would do both.

It is not totally without risk as a good rental are can dry up leaving you with excessive vacancies but overall the strategy is fairly conservative.Sean takes a more aggressive approach.

In RI our lease says we can charge for excessive water use.

(If you sold for a loss, though, you can't take a deduction for that loss.)You can use this exclusion every time you sell a primary residence, as long as you owned and lived in it for two of the five years leading up to the sale, and haven't claimed the exclusion on another home in the last two years.If your profit exceeds the $250,000 or $500,000 limit, the excess is reported as a capital gain on Schedule D.I was in the home for 6 years and profits didn't exceed the $500,000 threshold (I'm maried filing joint).