Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here
Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties. Try BiggerPockets PRO.
x
Results (10,000+)
Don Corson Need Help Analyzing Pre-Foreclosure deal
2 May 2007 | 6 replies
I've been reading the forum, and reading up on the subject for the past many months, so I know enough to be *dangerous*...Here are the details.
N/A N/A Let's share experience in ZERO down real estate investment
7 May 2007 | 16 replies
Here is one that doesn't happen every day but will if you look at enough real estate.In 2004 I purchased a home "subject to" with a loan balance of $179,000.
N/A N/A Making Offers BEFORE seeing Property??
4 May 2007 | 18 replies
Thinking about this subject more...if you are sending an offer with around 30% below fmv, what if the repair cost (which you haven't assessed yet) are more substantial than you what you offered?
Matt H A crazy phone call last night....
4 May 2007 | 5 replies
I think it'd qualify under "networking".Back to the subject, those were definetly funny phone calls.
Sherlock Holmes Troubles
8 May 2007 | 3 replies
Example: “subject to inspection report acceptable to buyer” or “subject to favorable inspection” etc. 8)
Shanita Parker What's wrong with this house?
11 May 2007 | 7 replies
If you are concerned about what may be wrong then you should put a clause in that says it is subject to inspection.
Jimmy NA What would you pay?
11 May 2007 | 7 replies
The subject property is not on the market.
Mark Beekman Operating Expenses Estimate Too High?
20 February 2011 | 69 replies
And the only way to figure it out is to get data, data, data.Perhaps we can all agree that having a simple to use rule of thumb like the "50% Rule" is great to do a first-pass approximately of a deal, but that nothing replacing a full due diligence and financial analysis before actually purchasing.As for Bryan's other point about analyzing discounted cash flow (what some people refer to as net present value or NPV analysis), this is something that is tremendously important if you're going to be investing on a larger scale, and it's sad that more investors (in my experience) don't have any clue about NPV and its implications.I think I'll write a BP blog post on the subject, but suffice it to say, anyone reading this thread that doesn't understand NPV should do some research on the subject...
Tom C Advice on setting up an LLC
19 May 2007 | 4 replies
If you are going to own the property in your name and have the LLC do the management (collect rent, pay bills, maintenance), then that will be considered ordinary trade or business income and subject to SE tax.You would want an S-corp to do that.
Ruben Aguirre Can CMA's be trusted
16 May 2007 | 2 replies
(false evidence appearing real) that comes with the first deal, but I can't seem to bring myself to buy in on three Comparative Market Analysis that have been performed for the subject property.