As you dig a little deeper into the actual release by the provincial government the regulation only applies to licensed agents and appears to be "self-policing" by the industry itself ... so it may amount to a little more discretion, but not elimination of the behaviour.

If less than 6250 it probably wont work - but you can apply for a variance with little time and cost.

A family of six hoping to rent a two bedroom apt, a mentally challenged woman with two small children trying to escape an abusive husband, and a young couple, maybe nineteen or twenty, who were looking for a place they could share with his parents who'd just had their trailer repossessed are some of the people who applied for my most recent vacancy.  

Thanks for the shout out @Justin WindhamMy two cents:I agree with @Patrick Desjardins but maybe I'm misunderstanding the nature of the relationship.

So I have been applying the 10x rule, 4 hr work week and all these books and went from 1 proprerty to 2 with 3 in escrow.

It seems as though 804C provides the limitations on showing any preference as to who you are looking for. 803 almost seems to counteract this with us having under 3 properties until I reread the line "Nothing in section 804 of this title (other than subsection (c) ) shall apply to". 

The trouble is in Wisconsin this earnest money deposit has very specific restrictions as to how quickly it has to be returned and what specifically it can be applied to.

There aren't any more quick and easy finds.The last statement, about not having the mortgage covered even by three renters, will only apply if your purchase price was too high (which is kinda related to the temperature of the market).

Each constraint applies to the lesser of their net worth or income.  

You need to learn more about the nature of this kind of property.