My guess is that the difference is small, compared to the number of sales that took place in the last 10 years.If you're asking a supply/demand question over time, that's much easier to answer.

I have been fixing it up over the last month or so doing things to get it ready for selling, as well as adding some things to the house to make it stand out compared to the houses for sale in the area. .

Not sure where they are made but the only time I see a traditional "for sale" sign are on people's cars.

This is up to 30% below the value of comparables in the area.

I think they can be useful for comparing relative value, if they are established by a common process, like they are here in CO.

I'm finding most banks won't allow assignment of contracts these days, and while you can do a double close to get around this, if the other party (the ultimate buyer) is using any type of traditional financing, most banks won't finance through a double close because of the possible chain-of-title issues.So, be careful trying to find a buyer if you're able to get the bank to allow you to assign...

If its truly worth $260, meaning, there have been sales of comparable properties at $260K in the last 90 days, then it would be worth $182K, less any repairs, to an investor

That's not *that* bad compared to some of the ugly stuff that's going on, so why wouldn't they expect to get the full amount back, even if it means having to pay up after the house is gone and sold?

I would also assume property damage is at least equal or higher than comparable units however couldn't the leases have the Parents of the renters be liable for any damages their little darlings would inflict?

The rates are also the lowest compared to the large bank chains.