You or the buyer or both might need to spend a few hundred total to get a real estate litigation attorney to review all of the documents.They can be realistic with you and give you the odds of specific enforcement and if it's worth your time and energy.There are laws and then life experiences the litigation attorney has about trying cases or suing etc. and how practical or pie in the sky it will be to win.

COC 35x4+interest.As an example, here in the area we have a large custom home builder that finances and sells the notes, practically all the investor does I wire the money to the closer, the note goes to the servicer the payments go the bank....Go fish!

Its like buying your new Mercedes and the salesman you are dealing with drives a Dodge, you wouldnt want to work with them as they are not familiar bc they dont practice what they preach.That is just my opinion.

However, the right of a tenant to introduce a qualified replacement for any lease is common practice and generally provided for by law.

I did homework all night pulling comps, getting prepared, practicing what I was going to say.

Well, great, but in that case there were other and perhaps undue influences (in the bank's mind) to dump the property and move on, so it's questionable that that transaction met the definition of market value.But, if you are in business you usually want to follow generally accepted accounting principles, no requirement to for a private entity, but acceptable practices flows through to other issues, like taxes.

Even though it would become effective on signing, in practice I don't think it will go anywhere until the FL Supreme Court rewrites the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure.

Setting aside all of the economic and tax reasons for why TX is better, there is the very practical reason that Texas is far more landlord friendly than CT.

Is it a good idea to ask the mailman and/or code enforcement officer to let me know of any houses they know of that are vacant, for sale by owner, or otherwise potentially a good deal that is practically unknown to other investors?

Assuming a tenant has been screened (e.g. income, credit, rental history, criminal background, deposits, etc.) and is deemed qualified per the respective rental criteria, is it common practice to ask a tenant to subject to an inspection of their current residence prior to final approval of application?