Robert Littke
ROI
8 June 2011 | 8 replies
If you consider compounding effects, it's actually closer to 6% annualized return, and this still doesn't take into account the discount rate (remember, cash in-hand today is worth more than the same amount of cash in the future).Assuming a discount rate of about 3% (what you could get in a 3-year CD at essentially no risk), the actual discounted return is about 3.2%, or less than half of the 6.6% it appears to be using simple annual percentage rate calculations.So, if the OP thinks he can get more than 3% return on the $300K, he should take the $300K now...
Mike Knowles
Seeking thoughts on potential deal
22 June 2011 | 12 replies
I wouldnt waste money upgrading it besides the BARE essentials.
Rich Weese
Is it still possible to get really RICH
9 April 2012 | 65 replies
Hard work and determination are an essential part of getting to your goals.
Rich Weese
Taxes, taxes, taxes-raise or lower?
26 June 2011 | 26 replies
Originally posted by Rich W:If there is still a question whether to raise or lower tax rates, please back it up with facts, or history, please.You haven't backed up anything with facts or history...in fact, you've provided essentially no useful information above.
Kyle Meyers
Letters from Indianapolis Water
15 July 2011 | 8 replies
Tenant understands and agrees that essential services are to be maintained and operational at all times."
Tim Anderson
Having a Nightmare with a Contractor
26 June 2011 | 20 replies
You essentially become the GC and everyone works under you.
Zachary Dosch
Just getting started...
29 June 2011 | 6 replies
Essentially, in the long run, expenses will run about 50% of market rent - but find one of the threads that go into this in more depth.
John Smith
Will this approach to homebuying work?
29 June 2011 | 11 replies
since i rightfully question whether any exclusive buyers agent truly puts my best interest over their own in a real estate transaction, i believe the quality of representation i would receive from a "dual agent" over an exclusive buyers agent is essentially the same. the advantage to this approach is that i am not bound to any long-term buyers agency agreements with one individual and that in any transaction, i am always able to compromise the quality of the listing agent's representation to the seller by forcing the listing agent into dual agency.does that make sense?
Megan Broom
What is a fair percentage for this partnership?
27 July 2011 | 8 replies
However, they will of course start with a few deals so I do not want to give up half of my profits to my friend when I have other investors to use.My friend is going to be doing no work, so essentially he just brought the fund to me.Thank you for the advice!!