My recommendation would be to detail out the reject --  such as: - Applicants with felonies of malicious intent in the past 5 years = Rejected - Applicants with felonies of malicious intent over 5 years prior = Reviewed (may affect overall applicant "scoring") - Applicants with felonies of non-malicious intent in past 5 years = Reviewed (may affect overall applicant "scoring") - Applicants with felonies of non-malicious intent over 5 years prior = No impact - Sex Offenders = Reviewed (may affect overall applicant "scoring")I would recommend having criteria in writing on how you review those marked "Reviewed" and this can vary from company, as long as it is consistent for all applicants. 

@Mark Nolan, are any of your clients here on BP?

Mention the weather if you’re near where your mark lives.

@Mark W.

I challenge you to mark what advances you made from today and how your competitors didn't.

I am sure she was shaking her head when she saw my post.I think the question can be more refined:What are the chances that we would lose a legal bedroom in an appraisal, given what Mark Ainley pointed out above?

hey mark what positions are you trying to fill as in more specific like all around handyman?

For a shopping center how much would you expect to spend psf for asphalt sealing and pavement markings?  

,@Becca Summers, @Rob Green, @Alison Kovac, @Jed Alsup, @William Hochstedler, @Brian Christensen, @Taylor Harris, @Mark Kemp, @Ron Lopez, @Brad KoivuWanted to let all of you know about a Utah meetup on Thursday, December 3rd at 6:30 pm at the Huddle (Ft union Blvd and about 2600 E.) in Cottonwood Heights. 

Originally posted by @Mark Nolan:@Damon LillyWelcome to Bigger Pockets.