In most states, the public auction clears out any junior liens, but there are exceptions such as tax liens, which typically will continue to be in effect after the auction"They are transferring title via SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED, rather than TRUSTEE DEED,so there's this:Special warranty deed Arizona and junior liensArizona Revised Statutes33-402, Forms for conveyances; quit claim; conveyance; warranty; mortgage .... 33-723, Right of junior lien holder upon foreclosure action by senior lien holder ... 33-730, Limitation on deficiency judgment on mortgage or deed of trust as .... 33-1226, Easement to facilitate exercise of special declarant rights ...www.azleg.state.az.us/arizonarevisedstatutes.asp?

However, they have the option to pay off subsequent (newer) liens at any point and would roll the redemptive value of the subsequent lien into their lien.You can negotiate a discount with another lien holder to buy the lien (at a discount or a premium), but you cannot negotiate with the tax collector for a discount on the payoff of a lien (either as the homeowner or another lien holder).

HUD will not lower the voucher holders payment because they are being garnished, so if this happens it is highly likely the tenant will get behind on rent.

if it is a small asset holder try giving them a call it is worth a shot see also  if you could call the probate lawyer first

@Kevin Starr The LLC can't get the loan, unless it was a business loan, so an individual would be the holder of the note.  

I did build a website of my own but it's more of a place holder than an actual marketing engine. 

Why would a first mortgage holder even consider such a concession?  

The schedules and conditions from the bank make it pretty clear that if a second mortgage holder were to pay off the first mortgage holder they could take over the property at any time up until the date of closing, which is in late March.

A note holder does not convey title, that is already held by the borrower, the note holder has a lien and upon full payment they release the lien.

I'm certainly no expert on retirement plans and their legal implications, but it sounds like in this case, your retirement plan would be directly benefiting you as interest-holder in your business (since it's reducing the business' debt), which would violate the basic tenet that there can't be any benefit derived by/from the plan.Again though, I'm not an expert, so it's quite possible I'm missing something...