data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3bd80/3bd8094f7ff8b6264e8581d443c466fe9265971d" alt=""
27 September 2014 | 5 replies
Be prepared that there is often a lot of unwritten policy in terms of how the code is actually interpreted and enforced.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/29cf0/29cf0e675b61838c2c81b61ccac80c9484dd078a" alt=""
27 September 2014 | 21 replies
Instead of a legal written agreement to interpret the judge has to try to go by each side and their version of events and try to make a decision on who is right.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f847f/f847f5dd6a8111bb0b72c9d6d4a47daf3c2ad530" alt=""
28 September 2014 | 9 replies
Dodd-Frank lays out some very broad restrictions & requirements and then charges the states with figuring out how they interpret Dodd's requirements and how they will implement them.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/84417/84417501b91a9e4f58e605fd2554303d21a13ada" alt=""
29 September 2014 | 7 replies
There was a thread here a few days ago with some newer rulings from the CFBP on their interpretation and definition of "consumer" loan and "residential" mortgage.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d56dc/d56dc2e911a496c502269027c11b80a7efb75002" alt=""
15 August 2015 | 13 replies
@Loren Whitney & @Dmitriy Fomichenko .......From what I am hearing you guys say about depreciation within a SDIRA, it sounds like (I could very well be interpreting it wrong too) that IF a person was to use leverage within the SDIRA, that somewhat or mostly negates peoples argument 'that there is no benefit to hold real estate within a SDIRA' (meaning no depreciation benefit).
8 October 2014 | 45 replies
Unless you (1) would prefer to pay a company to interpret the data, or (2) you're planning to Go door to door to count population yourself, you're unlikely to get better data than the US Census.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a7294/a7294686e9612726cb09b90777e8afdfc931088a" alt=""
29 October 2014 | 6 replies
I don't disagree with the article but I don't think that interpretation was your intention as you wrote it.Thanks,Matt
25 November 2005 | 4 replies
im not sure. i bought the project, funded to project and so on. i had no credit in 04 (19 at the time) and my partner had little built up credit, the seller/lender agreed to sell only if i provided someone with credit. im waiting to sell summer of 06 because of the two year mark for capital gains.am i interpreting the capital gains all wrong?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7e395/7e395d41cb6c8c2c84b412663b882d483ba66108" alt=""
3 May 2007 | 20 replies
What I do find challenging though, is that unless they can interpret the inspection, lots of little things that need repair might translate to the investor that there is too much wrong with the house, where in fact they are small, inexpensive fixes.I have also had deals where my buyers opted to save their $300 and got saddled with some big expensive fixes that would have been caught in an inspection, and we could have renegotiated the price of the deal or had the seller fix the problems.A friend of mine, and quite a seasoned investor, purchased a house from the president of her REI group, and trusted him to give her a sound house.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44a0e/44a0e99989322fa3289c05a5a846917646db1ee5" alt=""
22 April 2007 | 3 replies
It's not a motivational book, but rather one that's designed to teach you how to interpret pro formas and how to do and understand key calculations that are essential for success in real estate investing.And for fun I teach once each year at Columbia in their Master of Science in Real Estate Development program.I've been in the real estate software business long enough to have learned that there's no point in trying to sell people analysis software if they don't have a good grasp of the financial concepts that underly real estate investments.