data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f6c0f/f6c0ff01caff9fe5aa710a1d72236b22073fe054" alt=""
2 December 2015 | 12 replies
FYI: the term TURNKEY means a rental with tenants in place, with cash flow (but you need to due diligence to show you that).While you can find "turnkey provider" companies ( which act like a broker between sellers and buyers), you can also find properties (both SFR & MFU) on the MLS, FSBOs (for sale by owner), and even here on BP.So a "turnkey opportunity" need not imply broker style commissions or an intermediary like a PM(property manager).Best wishes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/96d07/96d0768bcc8bff7494bb455cf3d25b9e6454f0dc" alt=""
19 December 2015 | 17 replies
That's not from me, that's from one of the nation's leading police dog trainers in Arkansas I spoke to about training my dog.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1242f/1242f076785c87fa8745eb4fabc381c43824f4f7" alt=""
9 December 2015 | 7 replies
it simply implies that one buys the property and prays that it will appreciate(A bit of humor here)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/af8ce/af8ceb79ca9e4a3c2e2417adacabc5bfb8a45e9a" alt=""
9 December 2015 | 14 replies
I absolutely didn't imply that her being a single mother is a reason not to rent to her.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9e543/9e5434a5317a575fc81265d5d90666a8b14c2fdb" alt=""
15 December 2015 | 26 replies
You could potentially be liable under a theory of "quantum meruit" or "implied contract" depending on the terms of your lease.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/33cfb/33cfb4bda5eec6b71d77568dde0601826e4208e4" alt=""
29 December 2015 | 12 replies
actually if what you say is true it could be a respa violation, affiliate business associates have to be disclosed, it could imply kick back arrangements, big fines
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/609a3/609a315209ed34a1756ed47856ebe5304a02d859" alt=""
19 December 2015 | 11 replies
@Seth Tucker Your initial post implied that you already owned the property.
29 December 2015 | 7 replies
The attorney who represents the Seller would have a conflict of interest by implying they represent you too and you may be not fully protected.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4a6c4/4a6c41536eade6846780171ab56e1a5927ad0e3f" alt=""
23 December 2015 | 4 replies
I would try to contact a RE trainer in the state. everyone has to get their RE training from someone and the top RE trainer in that state will know whose good and whose bad.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/06732/067328a5faeb770299aa56b0e5b67b180659af47" alt=""
14 September 2015 | 7 replies
I'm a personal trainer here in South Carolina and looking forward to getting into real estate investing.