An under performing multi will take better managers in there than what was there, the property may have a tainted reputation, there can be deferred maintenance, if it's empty there is a lease up period where a new buyer needs more capital, and on and on and on......that bank doesn't want to see that property again if they really don't have to, really have to.But, if they are hung with a property, if they can find a strong borrower, that has experience they may give it another try, but they will be explaining that one in the next examination.When the say they want it off the books, they mean they want the liability off the books, they want REO assets off their books because they can't be in the ownership of real estate business and they want cash deposited instead of wasting RE.

On the surface, the property is performing well.

I'm not that smart and I've purchased over 3,000 units the past three years on behalf of the fund I work for and every single one of my deals has been a strong performer.  

Any service is only as good as the people performing the work.

They are likely to continue to trust you if you continue to perform.

However, I have read that SFH may perform better in the area.  

I was wondering if anyone else had feedback on the performance of this property.Additional, I have started to give more though to owning a second income property likely Brevard county/Melbourne/Palm Bay.

If the property has been stabilized for a few years you may be able to try a commercial loan, which is based more on the performance and less on personal finances.  

I'm not recommending against it, just perform your due diligence on the pros and cons. 

EQUIPMENT: Tenant/Buyer agrees to provide and be responsible for his own tools required to perform the services herein.5.