Remember the guys pushing these are equivalent to time share salesmen.

Some of it appears inconsistent and could be open to conflicting interpretations.

It appears there are still many items in the home, yet we truly can not tell if she has been home.We think she may have just left and left most of her furniture as the items are really not much to speak of as far as quality or value.Do we go to court to evict someone that is not there?

The only "unit 28" I can find is actually off Sinepuxent Ave and appears to be 3 houses in.Is the bump-out in the back new?

In any event, if it is allowed (most are), it must appear on the HUD-1 settlement statement, otherwise it could be considered Mortgage Fraud.

The executor/executrix is usually a family member and you will almost surely be perceived as an opportunist sending them stuff, thus your low response rate.When I did it I'd send general correspondence to the house that would appear to be coincidence.  

I'd add that you shouldn't aim the camera at the fixtures like you are doing, that is what makes the angles appear awkward.

They do seem to want move-in-ready houses, but it appears (in my county, at least), they're buying stuff 20-30 years old in many cases.

It appears to be a DRE concern (discussed at the DRE Forum in 2011) but I have yet to see it addressed further.

It didn't appear she paid the previous credit card creditors, either.