You’ve got to hear it from the source.So I finally found someone (that didn’t sound like an obvious Tigrent troll) telling about their experience in the Advanced Training.

Due to buyouts we have mostly sold properties for the last 5 years, but I finally am buying a new property in a neighboring town in the next 30 days.

I agree about just * 50%, but for my first analysis I wanted to get as close to actual numbers as I could and see how they aligned with the 50% and it worked out pretty close.

What they mean to say is that their guidelines are so nonsensical that even their own underwriters don't know they exist - as evidenced by the fact that my file went through 2 reviews of underwriting plus a final round to get me to final conditions (3 reviews) and none of them had said this was an issue.

Since we're covering many different tracks and topic areas, I'm not that concerned about this.Now that we've got our new space, I've got to finalize a few things and will then we'll start working on the schedule and final session coverage in conjunction with our speakers.

If you can post more info on the property I am sure people van run a simple analysis and see if the numbers make sense.thx,chris

In most cases they are losing a chunk of money when they finally throw in the towel.

Finally, I would look to make real cuts to our budget and everything would be open for discussion, including military spending, social programs, etc.

This is likely to reverse as we come to grips with our burgeoning debt and fed govt payrolls are forced to sharply drop (as well as all the leech industries like lobbying).Sorry to interject a macro comment into your analysis, but you could not only have a property with minimal/nonexistent cash flow, but appreciation could be the same or worse.

If the divorce is not final, then he might have to keep her on the deed and mortgage until the court resolves it.