Sure, there may be some who have to fight with the credit bureaus to fix errors, but I doubt that a credit report that you would deny a tenant based on, would be that big a mystery.For instance, judgments for cell phone and cable bills, or one for a previous landlord.  

The trial court did not err in granting defendants’ motion for summary judgment and in denying plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment.  

So I had to counter all the BS negatives he produced with pictures and documentation to assist the buyer - - 'fait accompli',  appraisal came in just 5k short the the listing price.The inspector was just way off base, opening subpanel covers and complaining on  the wiring - - just cleared by the City :sheeze:   Also made many ridiculous recommendations, including installing drains in all the flower beds.ALL such recommendations can be denied, I did, and I still closed at the listing price.Then too, the inspector & the appraiser both FAILED to cite a recent change in Code (cc 505.1) and it only got caught by the Fire Marshal and I had to scramble to get that corrected. 

DENY DENY DENY!

I'm going to ask the attorney how much discretion I have in this matter, ie, can I deny one tenant and permit another tenant, based on the one unit having wood floors and another unit having more resilient tile floors?

and that most can actually act 'normal' and deny it so much so that even their parents spouse or kids would swear they dont do anything 'but cigarettes' even when mj or harder drugs are indeed being used recreationally.i'd contact police to investigate (ie, what exactly is that white powder in my house?!) 

I requested a review of the charges he put on the deposit return, he denied.

The landlord stated that they denied them because of their background check.

I like cash flow and yearly high performance numbers from 'linear' markets, but I cannot deny the historical performance of SoCal properties.The reality is that by holding on to CA properties long term, it will appreciate.

You only have to worry if it can appear you're using a rule to deny someone who is a protected class.