There are many things to consider and I don't think that I would consider having to much 100% LTV property in my portfolio even if it was possible.Leverage can be a very good thing but it can also seriously impact your portfolio if property values decrease.

Projects should take around 6 months to construct and sell. 20-day dwell times for pulling new money and loan covenants that could impact other projects.

If your are has a lot of distressed sales, that would have a negative impact on the market value, so be careful.The house is located in the low income side of town, so there are obviously issues with its age, amenities and some minor crime.

And this is as demand is increasing.Resource shortage could have a bigger impact on our lives than any and all govt printing of money.

The cash flow might look good on paper but if vacancies are three times longer due to not-so-good location than they would normally be, wouldn't that impact the cash flow?

That would impact the overall headache-factor by ensuring you get good tenants who won't trash the place.

Assuming your rent assumptions are accurate, assuming there is no major differed maintenance issues, and assuming there is nothing out of the ordinary that would impact your NOI (such that your expenses were much more than 50%), this deal sounds great from a purely financial perspective.Obviously, there are other considerations (location, management, etc), but again, just looking at the numbers, it looks good on paper.

If we do see a default - even a short term one - it will likely lead to higher interest rates, which could negatively impact the fiscal position of the government and hurt the economy.

This made somewhat of a visual impact that draws the viewer to that highlight, and it reduces the likelihood of that post being skimmed over.

I'm thinking 10% may not be enough to cover transactional funding costs for double closing and giving me enough negotiating ability.This is on the deed so it would potentially impact the rehab as well.