It was not uncommon that they bought some of the worst houses (weird layout, dated, much deferred maintenance) in the nicest neighborhoods and then would try to relist them as-is to make a profit before ending up having to do the actual work required to the property for it to sell again, selling at a loss, or maybe making a little bit of money in transaction fees.

Or should I cut my losses, sell it now, and look to invest in something else later?

We have a dozen or so properties there, that are without water indefinitely, perhaps as long as month.Of course, that's small change compared to the utter destruction and loss of life.  

they can apparently help you with loss of rent.

Alternatively, some insurers will use the term Loss Payee.

By not taking a partial disposition deduction, you would be missing out on potential tax benefits associated with recognizing the loss on the disposed roof component.

There are so many ways to make a mistake during the process and so many ways to leave money you’re owed on the table, especially with loss of income claims.

So I'm okay not making the big bucks STR style, but I also don't want to do it at a monthly loss.

I am being told that the reason they charge that much is because the rich people building vacation homes out there will pay any amount and don't care about the immediate loss of equity and they have more business than they can handle.

Others are Mr Howell and his deck chair with the drink with the umbrella in it in the shade .