Surveys can be expensive depending on sample size and sophistication of materials and analysis, but if you have a large company it might be worth it to justify your name recognition, reputation and service performance to others.

The Internal Revenue Service disallowed this arrangement, contending, among other things, that a delayed exchange did not qualify for non-recognition treatment (i.e. deferral of income tax liabilities).

I'm tagging @Jay Hinrichs, who's politely of the vintage to give you the horror stories of straw men, cash boot, and dry land in West Texas to balance out valuations - all with exchanges done without a QI.For the minimal cost I'd recommend that you engage a QI anyway so there's no slips and accidental recognition of gain - particularly on their side.

My belief is that if someone has to resort to this method of sneaky marketing, it must be a scam where someone is trying to trick me into giving them my voice so they can rip me off.http://www.information-age.com/think-you-speak-voice-recognition-replacing-password-123461752/If I don't recognize the caller, I don't answer the phone.

It is a recognition that you are not doing enough to get in on the profits, with a side of hatred for those who are receiving profits.  

He has an uphill fight battling name recognition in Cuomo.

Please forgive any grammar mistakes - I am using voice recognition software which doesn't always recognize my voice.

It does have voice recognition, and a touch screen keyboard though if you don't want the slide-out.

You get their brand name and name recognition (although I had never heard of them a day before Friday Jan.10)2.

The point about the disregarded entity seems facially valid.