I will have my number on the sign so it wouldn't be hard for them to track down who's causing the mischief. 

The two terms do cause confusion for all the BP readers.

Everything depends on how bad you want the property, the tenants are both a short term issue, As a person that just sold a multi unit property, this 2 unit property is a walk in the park.I would not sell vacant,, but my tenants were on month to month..You knew looking at the property the tenants had current leases, the fact the tenants are creeps is what is. of course you can ask for lower price, but however you risk not knowing who is around the corner also looking,, would be worse if they both just signed new leases.The current owner could do an eviction if he has cause, but that takes time and no guarantees.

Last time I spoke to the loan officer, she told me that we should sell the house cause she doesn't think i will able to switch to a conventional mortgage and keep the house.

In one example provided by KBRA, if it was determined that the purchase option attached to a property violated consumer protection laws, tenants would then stop making rental payments, which could cause significant shortages in the funds available to the note holder to make payments to the servicer.And if that happens, the funds that ultimately flow to the bondholder could dry up as well.KBRA does caution that rent-to-own and lease to own securitizations are in their extreme infancy, and said that it expects to see “significant diligence and disclosure” surrounding the deals’ inherent risks.

Does this cause anyone to revise their assessment of where the real estate market may be headed next year?

I know this issues will cause the rehab to take a bit longer, but now we are 1 month behind schedule.

It sounds like the negative rental reference would be just cause for denial.

Something is causing them not to sell?

They can be held culpable if they or one of their invitees caused the damage.