This website actually explains it a little better, http://www.business.ftc.gov/documents/bus53-brief-financial-privacy-requirements-gramm-leach-bliley-act Specifically this info: Opt-Out Rights"Consumers and customers have the right to opt out of - or say no to - having their information shared with certain third parties.

First, if you are separated from your spouse or have filed, assets and liabilities incurred after that date will go the party incurring them.

That part is truly no big deal.A stream, OTOH, is a really big deal.

I'd think that getting a title/escrow settlement agent to do a double closing, mot having funds available in the A to B transaction would be tough enough without tossing a bank in the mix as the A party selling.

He furnishes a funding letter to my attorney who forwards it to any party requesting proof of funds.

1) Talk to a local RE attorney, as there will be twists and nuances in the local state law that will determine strategies, and which party has the superior redemption rights.2).

It's like that game of telephone when you were in elementary school and the words could have completely changed by the time they get to the end party.

We will not be having one in Dec. as it is a members only party, but starting up in Jan you should come join us.

An order allowing the bankruptcy to be re-opened for the purpose of filing an amended schedule listing the land as an asset of the debtor after notice to all interested parties.

This second risk will be significantly greater in liberal states.Basically subject 2 is a deal based on trust and any one of three parties Seller, Buyer and Bank can screw it up for the others