data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/579f7/579f7a5000ae32ebcbc1068d29a30c30b90858cd" alt=""
18 April 2017 | 4 replies
Subject says it all.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2383e/2383e5517b36b59db424d0211212f3d497a3c078" alt=""
6 April 2017 | 37 replies
I believe "excessive" in this case might be subjective.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9362c/9362c0c79a2627d058864bbc56bca07945bb8945" alt=""
9 April 2017 | 5 replies
Also, with conditions applied such as, 'subject to buyer finance', am I able to back out of the deal within the due diligence period, if I am unable to find an investor willing to purchase the contract?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bb74f/bb74f3a5a9096c9e78d3d8c325ee7a9b72de56ff" alt=""
6 April 2017 | 10 replies
@Erik Romo If it isn't assumable (very few are these days) just do a Subject To or a Wrap.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6dd45/6dd45c525075981fee6db22ff57af0ed4baff9b8" alt=""
6 April 2017 | 2 replies
Putting a price on the contact list is really subjective so it's hard to determine what might be a fair value.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/23fe1/23fe12364c7370e4e89c193d31aa03a6d5817471" alt=""
6 April 2017 | 2 replies
This is a subject thats widely debated in the REI community.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3f284/3f284c9fa5e7e1307d1010cd43f8734169f1c695" alt=""
14 April 2017 | 12 replies
Even allocating a portion of the monthly rents towards the down payment is an exposure.Each State can have unique issues with this approach, so you should ALWAYS get legal counsel on this subject and how to draw up the agreement.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d42d9/d42d90cb92a8153a0f2348b302dbbfd9d13dac7c" alt=""
6 April 2017 | 2 replies
The subjection property could have been built in 2015 or 1915.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c630e/c630e287537a314a14e3c6c6dc798afdcb3ea4ea" alt=""
6 April 2017 | 1 reply
If so, then yes. there may be a tax advantage (subject to other income limitations and issues) for depreciation, utilities, mortgage interest, property tax, etc.If the house was not available to rent, then it was not "in service" yet, and there would be no tax issues.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/26e6c/26e6cd7054e4482593d6ccd3656baeac4bf0ad95" alt=""
13 April 2017 | 23 replies
You could look up the subject on here which is where I read about it.