On a $290k loan, I would want my buyer to have more skin in the game than $15k.What would the tax implications be if she refinances or pays off the loan early?

the flipper is in essance getting hundred 100% financing and has no skin in the game.. one thing that could sway the deal though is some cross collateral. 

The skin in the game investors are doing as expected. 

It gives them skin in the game, helps them learn the common terms and speak your language.

It sounded like a really good way to benefit from cash flow with minimal risk and very little skin in the game.From what I gathered, the point of this strategy is to lease a property from someone with the option to sub-lease, then re-lease the property at a higher rate and pocket the difference.Can someone out there break down the strategy for me?

  @Aaron Mazzrillo what private lender will lend on such terms and won't give the, "you have to have skin in the game."

They have more skin in the game then you do.Make sure you get clear title.

When they have some skin in the game, they’re more likely to have a vested interest in their home AND the park, which is the type of tenant you want.

Would this be a good time to seek that out private money for 12-15% with as much skin in the game as I have, or would it better to seek out conventional financing after the single family is complete?      

But there are many ways to skin a cat and everyone's situation is different.