I'm thinking here about the possible eviction (worst case) and the possible effect on my annual return.

@Ryan Roesch - yes, they are supposed to remove it at 78% however I do not know the repercussion for them not doing so.

OUR OFFERING CIRCULAR CAN BE FOUND BY FOLLOWING THESE LINKS: [link removed]THE OFFERING IS AVAILABLE IN ALL STATES EXCEPT TX AND WA.FOR OFFERINGS OF BITS UNDER REGULATION A THAT HAVE NOT YET BEEN QUALIFIED, NO MONEY OR OTHER CONSIDERATION IS BEING SOLICITED, AND IF SENT IN RESPONSE, WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED.

In regards to the termination contract, it was with the realtor and thwt’s A whole different story but it was thoroughly reviewed since I wanted a clause removed and refused to sign it until it was.

The value of the property has a direct effect on the amount of leverage that can be geared for that property to ensure a particular rate of return for investors. 

The net effect will be, you will get to deduct 1/2 of self employment tax and full health insurance expenses.

After inspections I was able to get a $3000 repair concession effectively paying my $200k initial offer!

Now some of the fixes are as follow: Before property was rented out, there was snow removal that ran $140.

It stated in effect, that CAMs would be prorated over the then leased area, not the percentage of GLA that our unit represented.

I assume you mean some kind of code violation but that rarely has any impact on anything other than to cut your lawn by the deadline the code enforcer told you to cut it by or, to remove the car on blocks from the driveway.Open permits?