If you'd like you can PM me on specifics which can lead to a phone call, much easier.BTW, my comment above concerning predatory was not meant to say you were being predatory, but that those acts as seen in that light, When you take something away from a buyer, a "right" or acceptable practice by agreement there needs to be some other aspect that balances out the fairness as consideration for that loss, an additional benefit shown for the buyer.

With that stated,  this gets dangerous if the investments are riskier and you are over leveraged on the property.

I found out that  one of our duties as property owners is to "educate" our tenants about the importance of rent first above all other financial concerns.

Concerning the PMI, we could also go conventionnal and still put 3.5 down and get the PMI waived whenever we reach 20% equity (which would still take a while).Lots of people at work live in the burbs but they all have kids.

RCG is concerned that individual states may mistakenly apply the same proposed standards to non-depository lenders who originate and service manufactured home loans made as non-real estate, or chattel loans. 

If you are concerned with all the tenants leaving, choose to raise one per month.  

My fiance's mother lives up there and last we spoke she was concerned about her home losing value.

I think it looks cool, my only concern would be what @Chris Jenkins alluded too.

Danger Will Robinson!

We have some concerns with considering expenses in our model, specifically with replacement reserves in comparison to general maintenance, how much to set aside for reserves, etc.Thank you!