I've noticed that quite a few brokerages say they will hire someone that doesn't currently have a license but is working towards one. 

were they installed properly or is something obstructing them?

I’m currently a student at Kennesaw State University I’m only 22 years old right now I’m hoping to become a real estate agent so that I can one day become a broker my question is what are the major differences between having a real estate license and simply investing in real estate.

The key is to screen properly, collect a deposit commensurate with the level of risk a particular tenant presents, and have tight processes in place to stop problems early.

What it’s worth is irrelevant.....it’s what you pay for it that counts(and yes you can include repair/improvement costs If done properly, and within the 180 day window)

Close and flip or try to broker without a license and assign.

Is either way better, easier or more proper??

I am a licensed real estate agent here in AZ but this is just a question to this community. 

Lets start by stating that they have to be licensed, which is required by law including going through extensive background checks, be financially fit themselves, and go through education on laws and mortgage practice.

Make sure everything is working properly, have a little coffee maker and leave some water, champagne (2 night or longer stays), breakfast pastries, or something similar for your neighborhood.