Please apply sound logic when drawing implied conclusions.And, I'll bet mr. landlord makes alot more than a pretty penny for every copy of this stuff that is sold by their affiliate marketing arrangement.

Calm down and act logically.

AKA homes over 10 years old, that haven't been inspected in 2-3 years ALL (not just rentals) randomly get inspected, I can see logic behind that. 

I feel the promise of "excellent PM" is not logical.

The change cam from many who submitted logical justifications for some allowances, not by yelling at them about my rights as I see them.

However I'm hesitating trying to navigate the SAFE Act and how it affects a potential lonnie deal.Can anyone provide some logical input to help me out?

I'm wondering the same thing Mike.Wouldnt the logical solution be to try to work out an owner financing deal with the seller so youre putting some money down and still have money to make repairs, Then find a buyer and seller finance with him, preferably with a move in fee to recoupe the repair/any holding costs etc. and by doing so you wouldnt be renting the home you would be selling the home.

Simply signing and returning the form to us would more than validate a property I would believe.Mailing a form to them seems logical and doable.

Also adds more liability for my actions since the logic is since I am licensed I should know better etc etc.

My original point is that this is. . .well, perhaps as a copywriter might say, false logic.