Possible amendments: tenant alone accepts all liability for any harm caused by pet; no vicious breeds allowed; tenant must get rid of pet at first indication of dangerous behavior (this one may have a downside--it makes it seem as though the landlord has ability to remove the pet, which is an inference to avoid since it increases the possibility of landlord liability generally).

With your scenario it will remove most of our headaches.

Interestingly, I just checked the forum and that post has been removed by the Moderator. 

I typically go 15 years back and also remove LLCs because they're going to be investors, like you, playing the same game.

I’m also a realtor, so any help you need with acquisition, I’d enjoy the opportunity to help.On another note do you know any good snow removal companies/property managers?

If you ask the manager to justify a fee and he starts hemming and hawing, move on or require them to remove the fee.

But even then the individuals A B and C are still removed from actual ownership by the LLC and the partnership.If the partnership didn't want to hold onto the properties I would recommend that the partnership do a 1031 exchange and purchase properties satisfactory to all and then after letting the dust settle dissolve the partnership and distribute the properties to the individual members. 

I did this (after I bought) and found out that the tree was hit multiple times by lightning and unsafe/dead in the middle....had to remove.

Going into my first winter as a landlord and curious to hear about how you all handle snow removal.

Buyer’s will not pay as much as an owner occupant.Selling after lease expiration and removing tenants: Pro’s 1.