Putting Subject To's into a Trust doesn't make sense to me for a couple of reasons.

I’ve been told to ignore the 1% rule, but I’m sticking with it because it makes zero sense  to me to buy something that a) won’t cash flow well and b) is 30 years old and requires conservative repair and capex estimates.

I need to start looking at properties that will qualify for the lower rates...it doesn't make sense to invest directly otherwise.

Yes, financially many times it makes sense to buy and move into a new primary as rates and terms are better. 

Like the old adage "what we lose in profit, we'll make up in volume" makes no practical sense. 

When rents come in, should we have them come into an LLC to divide equally at that point or does it just make sense to bring them in personally and just pay out the partners?

I am the listing agent for local wholesalers so often move deals to investor friends befor they hit the market at #s that actually make sense.

loan costs as a percent of purchase price for sfh dont make sense. with cash you can use a fast close condition to push seller to accept a below market offer. when you finance you are better off to go for a larger property. i financed both my duplexes in bklyn and parma at purchase time. for all of my 5 sfhs, i have used cash and then refinance later

Also, It would make sense if you have larger net-worth to begin with.

After all, the numbers have to make sense and we are usually not emotional about it, but are there anything that we can bind the sellers before attorney review is over?