data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9802d/9802d964ae13b97230228ae575b9fb837ebcf597" alt=""
19 November 2007 | 5 replies
Thats the key being able to protect it from the stupidity and carelessness of tenants and using abraisives.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/03726/03726de65d2319db518e08599e83bfa2b47741f8" alt=""
10 March 2013 | 28 replies
Or is it just a redundant doubling of the protection just in case one of the wires is not connected properly or gets chewed through or something?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c77f3/c77f331ceeabf4dd3faf53da1c1574b749af9248" alt=""
24 October 2007 | 11 replies
Set it up so your interest in protected yet you have the liquid cash for the personal legal activities.Do not let the ex jam you up.
12 November 2007 | 5 replies
Or, how does everyone protect themselves from lawsuits etc while investing with a lease purchase?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6a6bc/6a6bc77112c85846494db2c459baeb38aaf79f10" alt=""
25 November 2007 | 9 replies
Not good or bad but clearly beyond the scope in may ways.Online surveys can make it very easy to protect your identity.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3b50d/3b50d12c252fd68844f997572dd618e9c4d9ea96" alt=""
13 November 2007 | 0 replies
* A person soliciting door to door for repair work. Though they may seem quite knowledgeable and appear friendly, this is not a common tactic of a professional contractor. Door to door soliciting leaves very little ev...
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d135c/d135c2dc7160dc82f6dc6e833a1b255729079455" alt=""
19 November 2007 | 4 replies
Also, my parents have some rental properties, and I was wondering if it is possible to put the properties under my LLC without actually deeding them to me, or would they have to form their own LLC for the asset protection?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d6a7b/d6a7b118dd2d4818499fe6933405879b551052cf" alt=""
26 November 2018 | 37 replies
Additionally a rule such as 1-1-6, which seems Un-American by limiting competition in business-to-business transactions, probably would have resulted in many individuals and business unknowingly violating the rule and being subject to potential fines for promoting the repair of properties and helping to stabilize homes values.I would think that many would ask “Why did the Board (DORA) promote the interest of mortgage brokers, limit competition, and slow the recovery of property values (and the economy) when many of the statutes passed to help protect tax payers and homeowners from predatory lending and restore a stability to property values?”
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/61870/6187001114a32191688fa42255aba0bf39c7b4a1" alt=""
25 November 2007 | 10 replies
This is to protect their interest in the property.