data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/05083/0508322352d917d927846e06627acc788a994900" alt=""
13 October 2014 | 10 replies
I loved what he had to say simply because I love complicated Asset/Tax schemes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/061cb/061cb5125fcdecfa77d53ef359638f2ee6aaaabf" alt=""
19 February 2015 | 3 replies
It was too complicated aside from the sub-2 situation!
15 October 2014 | 16 replies
Since partners die, this arrangement complicates buy outs and heirs inheriting the LLC interests when partners split profits differently than to their capitalized positions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bcebf/bcebffe79b8031ea216948d17be81ab6abcea1bb" alt=""
1 August 2015 | 31 replies
That will give you "standing" to start a probate, which could be a small estate probate (less complicated, less expensive), or a suite to quiet title.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7d697/7d6978d42e1bbe43bd024c3e3112194b7e471e51" alt=""
18 July 2017 | 51 replies
The best thing in a lease option is to keep it simple, which is a total oxymoron because lease options are truly complicated AND high risk (for the Seller) in an increasing market.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/37386/37386396f968a8ece0b4b8863fb6f659d8a56742" alt=""
15 October 2014 | 6 replies
It was just to complicated, and ended up buying 3 of the properties cash.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2a2a4/2a2a4ad97371a30f84e7f4f60ea95f78d2240fd0" alt=""
22 October 2014 | 21 replies
Is investing in property as complicated as that?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4faca/4facaaca01e1c195a7bafffd78e92327f0148cae" alt=""
16 October 2014 | 15 replies
Move on out of the wholesaling mode, doing the proposed method is more complicated and has less of an upside giving away future profits. :)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/04896/04896802ac19ba075c6190066fc788453f579d6f" alt=""
1 September 2015 | 47 replies
@Anna ShaverWhen I mean global debt coverage it assumes total cash flow before taxes divided over total cash flow going out as a "global," picture view.So if you had:Income -10000 salary (both)3500 rental income "net"Expenses -Expenses (living) of 2500Mortgages (total) of 3000Other Obligations (Car/Credit cards/etc) - $0It would be 13,500 total cash in flows / 5500 cash outflows = 2.45X global debt coverageThe above is a simple way to look at it and there might be adjustments to this but I didnt want to get complicated.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5f06c/5f06cbaea65b36085d6845e5af92c0f42fcfec1b" alt=""
22 November 2014 | 7 replies
These days that doesn't cut it.I wouldn't do the whole incentive thing with bonuses that you are thinking about, sounds too complicated.