data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/71d5a/71d5ae9613141d5eddc405bef66d22d46449d593" alt=""
22 December 2015 | 2 replies
A summary of the changes can be found here:SEC Staff Recommends Updates to Accredited Investor DefinitionWhat's good:You can now take a test to qualify under the proposed rulesThere seems to be some critical thinking about the thresholds and indexing them to inflation instead of picking an arbitrary number and leaving it staticThere seems to be some critical thinking about who can invest whatThose with experience in private deals can exempt outWhat's bad:It seems hard for portals or funding platforms to implementWealthy investors are capped unless they make over $500k annually or have $2.5M in net worth
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a7ec4/a7ec4fbe5b7012f22fb57198951f0a1cd8fb65a2" alt=""
23 December 2015 | 5 replies
I quickly realized that, if played correctly, the real estate platform could provide a solid foundation of wealth for many generations to come, while simultaneously producing cash flow today and allowing me to retire early.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1f60e/1f60e97df6c6a62f80d50f92b4624fdeb9ecf4d0" alt=""
24 December 2015 | 3 replies
Hi Everyone - I've been investing in stocks for years but I'm new to the real estate game.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cacba/cacba4a2c6fe802f3f1820bb85974f210d71d8be" alt=""
23 December 2015 | 3 replies
Feel free to give me a buzz if you want to chat about how we structure things.Remember, the game changes greatly when you can do houses with 100% other people's money.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/10c78/10c78f24bd43a915dcff67faf07e8d811378fa51" alt=""
26 December 2015 | 19 replies
@Alexandra Gortchilova you might want to consider crowdfunding platforms as an opportunity to get into the money lending game.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/02045/02045c9a01fb8c557530a4f9911f57f4af6cf9fa" alt=""
26 December 2015 | 5 replies
Since this is a numbers game, the only way you can answer the question is to do the following:Establish a relationship w/ a realtor winning to run some comparables for you showing the potential value if you convert from a 2 flat to a singleIf the values are not significantly hire than your mortgage then hold on to it as a 2 flatIf the values are significantly hire than your mortgage then get some estimates for converting from a 2 flat to a single.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b20f1/b20f11180b8fa9a5064877717348bad256051bc5" alt=""
25 December 2015 | 15 replies
Of #1-3 I prefer #1&2 over #3 as I feel the provider has more "skin in the game" and their compensation is better aligned to yours as the passive investor.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/90a47/90a470b67ba75a322bfa7835d6bdcea21cffc9d7" alt=""
24 December 2015 | 11 replies
insurance policy is a good way to go.I have been in this game for 40 years and never even came close to sniffing a lawsuit from a tenant.. but of course the very day I say this you get sued..
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e3e93/e3e937618755633295e459b158a28e8ff0e2197e" alt=""
2 January 2016 | 42 replies
Spend time on the forums to get a solid grip on the real estate game.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/55590/555902db248a8b778ab3301c959b3b2bd8889bad" alt=""
26 December 2015 | 6 replies
That changes the game a lot...you don't want to move somewhere of course that you hate just for the sake of being able to invest there.