There will still be renters, but they shouldn’t have to bear the burden of your revenge   "There will still be renters, but they shouldn’t have to bear the burden of your revenge"The renters are bearing the burden of a RATIONAL response to the government saying "we may opt to allow tenants to stay without paying rent". 

We as consumers have the power to stop the flow of the dollar when and where we want to.

In my opinion, any consumer/clients needs a strong return on their investment in a professional service.

In the recent Consumer Financial Protection Bureau report on housing, the chart on page 11 Table 1 foreshadows that increased foreclosed properties are coming.

Those are some great podcast, I have them queued up in Spotify as I just hit episode 100 (trying to listen to all the applicable ones starting from episode one...it’s time consuming but informative!)

Just a 5% vacancy rate would consume $280 of your allocated $400/month.  

I just consumed alot of information from Frank Rolfe at (Mobile Home Park University .com), as much many chunks (nuggets) of GOLD from @Brandon Turner , Jefferson Lilly, and Jack Baczek.

Though this option is the most obvious one, it is not always possible to opt for this.

A lot of people choose to BRRRR and then do a new roof in 3 years and a new driveway in 5 years, so the property keeps consuming it's cash flow, but they can say that they have made 25% in equity in the beginning.

This is costly, time consuming, and not a guarantee by any means.