I suspect the program is just using geographic data vs. comparing like property which is why there is such a broad range.

The rents charged are definitely at the lower end of the spectrum but are typical of 2/1 apartments.

Please review and comment regarding the impact of this broad interpretation of the law.

I think the forums are too broad and general and we need to tighten things up as it's becoming too messy and less user friendly, not more.  

Risk is a spectrum, so find a place that makes you both comfortable. 

It doesn't appear to have a very broad economic base with the majority of jobs being in military and healthcare.

@Katie Greenman I work as an IRA Specialist and honestly that's a broad question.

These hypothetical subsidies could be funded by a broad based tax, therefore spreading this burden out amongst as many people as possible (not just the small few who own rental homes).

You want to appeal to the masses...... not one end of the spectrum or the other or a smaller subset....that's reality.Just like selling a house..... you pick colors and décor that is going to appeal to as many people as possible....despite what you like and would want to live in, not everyone will have the same taste.

I don’t have MLS access but I’ve found that a majority of the 50K-65K properties that are listed on standard RE marketing sites seem to rent for between $750-$950 (neighborhood depending) a month and cash flow around $200-$350 monthly with the lower end of that spectrum being more common when I run the rough numbers.