
20 August 2014 | 7 replies
Assuming they didn't put $100,000 into renovations, they could still see a profit with whatever I can offer.I swear I just heard on one of the BP podcast someone was saying that you need to do the spaghetti test; keep making offers and see what sticks.

21 August 2014 | 10 replies
It appears to me that it is required and that it takes three years of experience after getting a real estate licence and is accompanied by a test.

26 August 2014 | 45 replies
I tested the outlet and it was around 119 to 120.

22 August 2014 | 11 replies
May be he needs to find a better RE agent to help w/ more accurate figures then.
26 August 2014 | 9 replies
I think you're looking at it right and I think your numbers are pretty accurate.

2 September 2014 | 9 replies
It's basically a "truth" test.

21 August 2014 | 2 replies
When you develop predictive models, you can determine the accuracy of your model by back testing its accuracy.Most people don't do (or even understand) how to develop predictive models.

24 August 2014 | 9 replies
I realize it's a leap to think I can get the property for x price, or not having accurate rehab costs, but those are things I would really look into more closely during a contingency period.I'm trying to work past this whole 'paralysis by analysis' syndrome I'm currently in, but I'm having a hard time trusting myself on these numbers when the house has been sitting for months and much savvier investors than me haven't scooped it up.Thanks for any opinions

22 August 2014 | 3 replies
A title Opinion, if accurate, still only deals with what is recorded/apparent, Today.

22 August 2014 | 0 replies
If you pass that test you get any deal you want in life..I listen hard Rock when I am doing Real Estate especially when go looking deals...