Even though it is the buyer's right to choose his/her title company, you can arrange with the buyer to use your title company - nothing wrong with that.

Trying to choose the "best" applicant opens up potential fair housing issues, even though you don't intend them.What if the "second best" applicant also happens to be a protected class?

In Utah there is a specific addendum to deal with assignment; however, I choose not to use it and simply do as stated above.

Seehttp://www.realtor.org/news-releases/2013/11/top-lenders-forecast-housing-market-gains-despite-new-ability-to-repay-rules4. if you choose the right seller financed buyer, i would not worry too much about foreclosure (e.g, a note and a mortgage - deed of trust).5.

Landlords that choose this strategy report that it is easier to put rent increases through because the tenant would rather stay and pay than move.

Dear Everybody,

I want to make some listing about the land I will sell, can you give me advices where the best web listing agregator with no scams.

Thank you

That is a risk I choose to take.

For me, choosing a tenant is not just one piece of criteria.

It is on a concrete slab and is big enough to fit a couple of bicycles, a kayak, a BBQ or whatever else the tenant chooses.

My question to you is, use a generic Purchase agreement and let the seller choose their own title company?