data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/571ec/571ece2dc31de113cc33c1ba3e54fdd9fa0ab0c1" alt=""
21 November 2013 | 16 replies
Perhaps I was drinking too much when I first read that, but my initial interpretation was that windows were part of common elements and thus POA responsibility (I hate legal jargon).Since it seems I may be incorrect on that, that makes me feel a little better.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ae852/ae852464c384c3ab3b09c34d79921d5d0141b84e" alt=""
6 December 2013 | 10 replies
Anyone care to interpret what this means?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/89c6c/89c6ce72ceab54a8068f3bbfcc1ea9e736d13c84" alt=""
9 December 2013 | 4 replies
I'm not sure how to interpret this statement about insurance:"Insurance premiums paid in advance.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ac9b4/ac9b49c43c081892e37dd1f18a7726ee0bee8cb3" alt=""
9 July 2014 | 15 replies
Once posted, any info is out there for readers to interpret, correctly or otherwise, and post, no matter their state of mind.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dbf91/dbf918a6b3734f5a38cbcf7a8e4a2c40f7a09fcc" alt=""
12 December 2013 | 4 replies
I keep seeing articles all over the internet discussing upcoming changes and my banker tells me that "the rules are always changing" but I am curious to find a location or two that I can find what changes are coming without having to go through all of the legislation line by line.I guess I am looking for an expert site to help interpret upcoming legislation but not water it down for the masses like CNN, Fox, or CNBC.Thanks!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3ec6d/3ec6d76452c3281724fe3d5f739cc7d26bb9e9d3" alt=""
12 February 2014 | 11 replies
Some tenants will provide for a friend or family member to interpret.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/52e05/52e050402f2669b23376790713dbb47ae1adbc52" alt=""
8 July 2014 | 12 replies
Every investor's opinion and interpretation of how the transaction should be structured is different.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2e667/2e667f412ab2a7272eec0f67683ca99a6dcf54cc" alt=""
15 November 2013 | 18 replies
For instance, you would weight the income method 60%, comps 20% and so on based on your interpretation of the market You should be able to do this without the assistance of an appraiser, at least in the initial evaluation stageshoul
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a4be7/a4be7cfab269acb981a602986dd2efa718fc28bd" alt=""
17 November 2013 | 7 replies
Not real sure what cap rate, etc means or how to fully interpret it.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9da95/9da95986989afc754909d7b58b1573de8b5b193c" alt=""
18 November 2013 | 9 replies
If we assume it is AR, then here is what you finance department says about private party exemptions:A person who engages in seller-financed transactions or who as a seller of real property receives mortgages, deeds of trust, or other security instruments on real estate as security for a purchase money obligation if: (a) The person does not receive from or hold on behalf of the borrower any funds for the payment of insurance or taxes on the real property; and (b) The seller does not sell the liens or mortgages in the secondary market other than to affiliated or subsidiary persons; (xi) An individual or husband and wife who provide funds for investment in loans secured by a lien on real property on his or her or their own account and who do not:(a) Charge a fee or cause a fee to be paid for any service other than the normal and scheduled rates for escrow, title insurance, and recording services; and (b) Collect funds to be used for the payment of any taxes or insurance premiums on the property securing the loans; The issue with the rule interpretation is that in some states an MLO must be employed by a company licensed to conduct the activity of brokering or lending.