![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/10098/small_1621349120-avatar-natwhit.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
27 July 2010 | 19 replies
Last test from morning problem.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/55001/small_1621412137-avatar-ijason.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
4 June 2011 | 34 replies
Funding is not the test of ownership.Bill, I really hope you have something solid to back up your claims of fraud.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/22471/small_1621361890-avatar-venomousviper.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
27 July 2010 | 12 replies
Just testing from earlier this morning problem.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/56169/small_1621412330-avatar-o2bnlv.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
1 August 2010 | 46 replies
Why not test the statements of our members here (official)?
3 August 2010 | 6 replies
Lots of properties that I pass up because they don't even pass the quick smell test.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/33614/small_1621366611-avatar-inmountains.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
4 August 2010 | 5 replies
I believe that it would pass the test of being ordinary and reasonable.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/54305/small_1621412039-avatar-audiowv.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
2 August 2010 | 2 replies
Will inspectors even enter a dangerous, burned out structure to take samples for lab testing?
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/40634/small_1621406618-avatar-davidb.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
3 August 2010 | 5 replies
Alas, according to the contract (which is all that operates here) though the treble test is met, there's a difference between sufficient "cause" and the remedy.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/41494/small_1621406912-avatar-aainvest.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
29 August 2010 | 12 replies
Well there are always 2 sides to every story.People will almost always slant their position.Most problems come from not doing upfront work.When you work with anybody in any capacity EXPECTATIONS from both sides have to be set upfront.Once you have the talk the broker will tell the buyer if they are being unrealistic or they do not want to take on that business.Once misconception out there is that brokers/agents are a dime a dozen.CRAPPY brokers/agents are a dime a dozen just like CRAPPY buyers/investors.Great brokers/agents are in high demand and sought after just like serious and realistic buyers/investors.You can't expect a serious broker/agent to SHOTGUN a bunch of low-ball offers expecting to take a ton of their time to hit PAY DIRT for you on a long shot.So all l am saying is for every nightmare broker/agent story I have 2 investor ones.As far as properties I always list the property or lock it up to assign.Some investors are trustworthy but many will stab you in the back and just want the deal.In GA if a buyer or seller try to go around me I can lien the property and stop the whole transaction from happening.This is commercial only not residential.I always test the sellers upfront before I list it.I always explain commission and how they can cancel at anytime but If I bring the buyer they owe a commission and I WILL lien the property.If they are an HONEST seller they sign the listing agreement.If they are out to screw someone they will balk at it.Digging out true intentions from both parties upfront keeps people from entering into bad relationships.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/35038/small_1621367776-avatar-bienesraices.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
8 August 2010 | 0 replies
Anyway, if my offer is accepted I'll have a full inspection done, including mold test.