data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3a3fc/3a3fccd554b591723d7a3568e5fd33629b055456" alt=""
21 January 2017 | 14 replies
Requiring impounds is standard practice if you're over 80%.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/378bc/378bcd9446238ff1125c7b5f904e3e8416d2bc8e" alt=""
24 January 2017 | 4 replies
@Jonathan Ramos, @Art Herbert is suggesting that you structure the deal to finance the property with a standard mortgage at 80% LTV (which covers the sellers existing loan) and ask the seller to hold a 2nd (carry the paper) on any remaining balance of purchase price that you work out with the seller.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/91d4a/91d4a13af7722c6c9cc2d21c96b923f78ca51291" alt=""
23 January 2017 | 5 replies
I am looking at $1350/ month for the same living expenses (with CA taxes, $300/ month HOA , insurance and internet tacked on to the standard mortgage payment) if I buy this place.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/af6fb/af6fbcc8b5c2451db5df0b81a2eebb8c6036b85c" alt=""
22 January 2017 | 2 replies
If I need to seek a partner to afford a down payment on a property, what would be the standard terms of a deal like this?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d9256/d925622c9f9e8bdd385c11264ce104f6b0200e6d" alt=""
27 January 2017 | 6 replies
There are several other standard market companies that should be considered prior to going with a nonstandard option as the coverage will be much broader, and most of the time, much less expensive.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/55ba3/55ba3f4198891c92cf0d8bff7a6a1d55211d43c3" alt=""
31 March 2019 | 33 replies
The regulations state that a persons income must only equal or be higher than the rent preventing us from using 3X rent as a income standard.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eff63/eff636daa84afdd4886751254cad2adb8b486d19" alt=""
22 January 2017 | 3 replies
I'll have $140 in it and could sell it for $240 right away, but the neighborhood is really starting to move, so hopefully in a couple years it'll be worth an extra $100K.I've got a couple others that I just did a light renovation on to rental standards and if the neighborhood really takes off, I'll redo them to high end "buyer" standards.You've got a good thought.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8fb1c/8fb1cee0cbed8e5965fc5f77a12f03ee5031b0d6" alt=""
22 January 2017 | 2 replies
I'm planning on living in the property and updating it as well as adding sweat equity to bring it up to standards for renters or potential buyers.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/94965/94965f268211131052ac78faf0624c62f66f16a1" alt=""
25 January 2017 | 10 replies
@Cory Newton research "Homestyle" loans if you want a standard conventional product for renovation work where you don't have to live in the home.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6ee20/6ee20d8aed5bc9aee05f9ca16f1afe357f05669d" alt=""
18 December 2020 | 55 replies
There are many pros, but two cons that seem most prominent in my mind of the bat: 1) getting a license doesn't make you an expert out of the gate, even with MLS - an experienced real estate agent can guide you into an emerging market that you might not know about vs. an obvious, saturated market, for example, or explain why a comp only .2 miles away is actually no good for your prospective purchase, among other things 2) if any litigation were to arise in your r.e. business, having a license will almost undoubtedly mean you are held to a higher standard, probably with respect to any aspect of the deal.