B of the article states:"...any plan described in Section 4975(e)(1) of the Code, including individual retirement accounts and Keogh plans; and"Here is what 4975(e)(1) states:(e)Definitions(1)PlanFor purposes of this section, the term “plan” means—(A)a trust described in section 401(a) which forms a part of a plan, or a plan described in section 403(a), which trust or plan is exempt from tax under section 501(a),(B)an individual retirement account described in section 408(a),(C)an individual retirement annuity described in section 408(b),(D)an Archer MSA described in section 220(d),(E)a health savings account described in section 223(d),(F)a Coverdell education savings account described in section 530, or(G)a trust, plan, account, or annuity which, at any time, has been determined by the Secretary to be described in any preceding subparagraph of this paragraph.I am sure there is far more to it than my trivial analysis, but it would be good for everyone to learn if someone could connect the legal dots here.  

General purpose loans can be taken from a 401k with a maximum term of 5 years.

@Franklin Marte consider the purpose of a down payment - Lenders want you to have skin in the game.

If you look at areas around Disney, there are many communities that are zoned specifically for this purpose, no need to worry about local ordinances or HOA's that change the rules on you.

in Non disclosure states your tax records will show purchase price 10 bucks.. this is how they work in Mississippi.. so if its off market there is no way to know what someone paid for it.. the assessor assess it by local values for tax purposes.In CA in the good ole days it was common for developers to pay more stamp duty.. as you could back into sales price by figuring out the transfer tax as it was based on a % of the sales price.. so developers would pay more on purpose to give the illusion they paid more than they really did..  

My guess is if the appraisal for insurance purposes was $2400, the cash value a jeweler would pay is probably less than $600, imo.

§§ 5101-5113).When reviewing the below comments we encourage HUD to keep in mind two of the purposes of the SAFE Act: (1) increase uniformity; and (2) reduce regulatory burden.

I have to say I don't see a reason for this (for marketing purposes, anyway)

You will also get a proportionate share of the expenses that can be used for the period home was rented versus the period of time you live in the home for federal income tax purposes.

We have been creating a general purpose software platform--I have been trying to find ways that each market can utilize it.