My investment strategy is “buy & hold” in hopes to produce a nice amount of cash flow.

If all they are doing is providing you with the funds to do it, then of course you could do that but no idea why they would come out of pocket to that level, and they would be unable to use the zero down solar financing.That said, you as property owner could and then include power in the rent, ensuring that they are still on the bill from the utility co so they are responsible for power in excess of that produced by the system if any.As a landlord, solar can certainly be a great idea for you as property owner and for the tenants who will potentially save monthly.

If an asset isn't producing the cash we want, even if it's a new asset, we analyze what we need to do for that asset to produce the cash we want.

It is the best return on investment, and if done right can also produce some decent cash flow.

But, you could have invested that $100 somewhere else, that could potentially produce a greater return.

As far as capital preservation vs net return goes, I'm at a point where I'm still focused on base hits & producing overall return.

Otherwise, you've got nothing to lose it seems, you can easily fall on your income producing assets, PT job, and searching for more investments. 

In a month the property will be producing positive cash flow and in three months the property will be producing $3000 a month cash flow. 

I’m in the same boat.  16 years producing some of the largest concerts on the planet and managing clubs and theaters across the country.  

I am on the market to purchase a duplex (preferably) or a house and convert the garage to an ADU if possible and live in the ADU while rent out the main house to produce cash flow.