
12 August 2014 | 13 replies
This is a federal requirement but provides no protection against lead paint lawsuits.

6 April 2014 | 4 replies
I would also caution people about hanging onto state laws that may vary, federal law prevails in every case and HUD can make a determination if state law fails to meet the intent and application of the D-F Act.If any investors gets close to a seller financed transaction they need to be familiar with this Act just as the should be familiar with other federal laws on RE such as TILA and RESPA. :)

10 April 2014 | 9 replies
I vote for something permanent and reasonable at the federal level to protect tenants.

25 June 2014 | 73 replies
The regulators are federal, not just state.

2 June 2015 | 2 replies
Has anyone dealt with Logix?
If so I'd love to hear your feedback/input, specifically in the Los Angeles area (antelope valley - palmdale)
Thanks

12 April 2014 | 1 reply
Plus it would affect the seller's tax liability, raising his current taxable ordinary income, and lying about his capital gain.

16 April 2014 | 11 replies
Unless you know how to review the paperwork according to both federal and state law, you really need a good lending attorney in the state you're buying to review your purchase.

14 April 2014 | 7 replies
My fascination with REI began when I was 21 years old working for the Federal Government as a Correctional officer.
15 April 2014 | 5 replies
Ned,You are right, I've been looking at numbers until I couldn't think straight.My depreciation losses did in fact reduce my taxable income.

16 April 2014 | 25 replies
There is no real federal counterpart for each state to copy so the differences can be huge.