22 May 2012 | 4 replies
If I can't be comfortable with the SD IRA companies, the only alternative is to pay the federal & state income taxes & 10% federal early withdrawl penalty, so we can buy things other than what the brokerages offer.
9 May 2015 | 36 replies
Be mindful that if you have a 401k and it's not kept in compliance, it will make things really easy for the IRS to simply condemn the plan and present you with taxable assets.
3 April 2012 | 11 replies
Anything of value in exchange for work is income.You may be required to provide withholding deposits as well, state and federal.
5 April 2012 | 6 replies
The interesting observation is those proclaiming this position the loudest are often the ones who have done little or nothing in legalizing their lending operations, let alone worked to achieve compliance under state and federal law.
8 April 2012 | 8 replies
They manage their taxable income and let there overall investments grow and take out what they choose.I run across a lot of people making large incomes that are accumulating some net worth.
19 January 2019 | 14 replies
Bankruptcy is a federal code, with state specific laws.
10 April 2012 | 14 replies
Or is there federal incentive for them to hold onto them?
29 April 2012 | 11 replies
HAving say a 250 dollar a onth mortgage you can deduct that from your NOI to lower your taxable income.
2 December 2019 | 25 replies
That's reality.Which I'd say why that association of private lenders chose the term, to soften public perception.Hard money lender really isn't a proper term, some state law may use the term to describe who might be regulated or define a lending practice but it's not in federal law that I know of, private lender is.The issue of an individual who wants to be in the business using "Private Lender" is obvious, they don't want any negative connation, if any, related to Hard Money Lender and they don't want to just say Mortgage Lender as that can bring regulators snooping at the door since they are regulated.