![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/1184792/small_1621509984-avatar-sheenal2.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
10 January 2019 | 10 replies
Hi, This exactly is my preferred method.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/910504/small_1694948613-avatar-marlissa.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
9 January 2019 | 2 replies
Preferably the easy valley?
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/782097/small_1621497291-avatar-michaelh432.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
4 February 2019 | 22 replies
I'm currently considering using a management company to deal with the maintenance things because I currently work a full time job and would prefer to approach this more as an investor (at least for now).
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/1364347/small_1621511656-avatar-jayl113.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
22 April 2019 | 0 replies
Our only problem is pulling conventional loans via our business, as it doesn't provide income in an orderly fashion like banks and standard lenders prefer.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/1140697/small_1621509495-avatar-uneeq.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
20 February 2020 | 65 replies
@Matt MichaelsonThe PM company was previously Preferred Management ( I think).
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/1270960/small_1621510853-avatar-michaelv220.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
26 April 2019 | 12 replies
say you have the following two deals in front of you A - 100k upb and 150k total legal balance, most of the difference is Corporate AdvancesB - 100k upb and 150k total legal balance, most of the difference is Deferred Balance would you prefer one over the other?
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/683909/small_1621495401-avatar-andrewj69.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
23 April 2019 | 5 replies
My preference is to invest in purpose built rental properties.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/1309562/small_1696955227-avatar-mattw289.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
25 April 2019 | 17 replies
(Effective September 30, 2018.)(1) A landlord may not, based on the source of income of an otherwise eligible prospective tenant or current tenant:(a) Refuse to lease or rent any real property to a prospective tenant or current tenant, unless the: (i) Prospective tenant's or current tenant's source of income is conditioned on the real property passing inspection; (ii) written estimate of the cost of improvements necessary to pass inspection is more than one thousand five hundred dollars; and (iii) landlord has not received moneys from the landlord mitigation program account to make the improvements;(b) Expel a prospective tenant or current tenant from any real property;(c) Make any distinction, discrimination, or restriction against a prospective tenant or current tenant in the price, terms, conditions, fees, or privileges relating to the rental, lease, or occupancy of real property or in the furnishing of any facilities or services in connection with the rental, lease, or occupancy of real property;(d) Attempt to discourage the rental or lease of any real property to a prospective tenant or current tenant;(e) Assist, induce, incite, or coerce another person to commit an act or engage in a practice that violates this section;(f) Coerce, intimidate, threaten, or interfere with any person in the exercise or enjoyment of, or on account of the person having exercised or enjoyed or having aided or encouraged any other person in the exercise or enjoyment of, any right granted or protected under this section;(g) Represent to a person that a dwelling unit is not available for inspection or rental when the dwelling unit in fact is available for inspection or rental; or(h) Otherwise make unavailable or deny a dwelling unit to a prospective tenant or current tenant that, but for his or her source of income, would be eligible to rent real property.(2) A landlord may not publish, circulate, issue, or display, or cause to be published, circulated, issued, or displayed, any communication, notice, advertisement, or sign of any kind relating to the rental or lease of real property that indicates a preference, limitation, or requirement based on any source of income.(3) If a landlord requires that a prospective tenant or current tenant have a certain threshold level of income, any source of income in the form of a rent voucher or subsidy must be subtracted from the total of the monthly rent prior to calculating if the income criteria have been met.(4) A person in violation of this section shall be held liable in a civil action up to four and one-half times the monthly rent of the real property at issue, as well as court costs and reasonable attorneys' fees.(5) As used in this section, "source of income" includes benefits or subsidy programs including housing assistance, public assistance, emergency rental assistance, veterans benefits, social security, supplemental security income or other retirement programs, and other programs administered by any federal, state, local, or nonprofit entity.
29 April 2019 | 7 replies
Pete is full of opportunity right now in just about any niche you want to tackle.Flips can be good but beware scope creep and capital gains, they're capital killers.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/1076675/small_1621508500-avatar-saml88.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
24 April 2019 | 5 replies
Right now, I'm looking to do my first deal somewhere in Florida, preferably in the Tampa Bay area.Looking forward to engaging with everyone on the site!