If a loss causes them to be unable to live in the unit until repairs are done who will pay for their hotel, meals etc. 

Only a certain sect of the human species would take a bite at this chum.

If you are unable to use them before selling the property you can use them when the property is sold to offset gains.You can do some tax planning during the year that may help.

Now, if you are unable to re-rent the home for the same price, the tenant can actually be liable for the difference, however, I wouldn't suggest taking it to court.

Once I get all the numbers together if I am unable to reach the 25% mark,at least, then I will re-evaluate it, but based on other project recently, I should be right in line to make this go.

I explained that I was unable to, and that's when the tenants claimed that "the landlord is responsible for repairs".

Unfortunatelly I'm unable to be more specific because I don't know his situation, but like I said, there is plenty of educational info out there that he can learn.

If I didn't call and ask, I would have committed to a deed that's way less favorable.The contract does say that they are not responsible for hardly anything, and it also has conflicting information.Here's an example of double language pertaining to title (10 of my contract):Seller shall be under no obligation to (A) remove any title exception, (B) bring any action or proceeding or bear any expense in order to enable Seller to convey title to the Property in accordance with this Agreement or (C) otherwise make the title to the Property insurable by the Title Company.BUT, right after that it says:IF, FOR ANY REASON, SELLER (A) IS UNABLE TO MAKE THE TITLE INSURABLE OR CORRECT TITLE PROBLEMS OR (B) IS UNABLE TO ASSIST THE BUYER IN PROCURING FROM THE TITLE COMPANY, OR ANOTHER REPUTABLE TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, AN OWNER’S POLICY AND LOAN POLICY, IF APPLICABLE, AT REGULAR RATES (C) DETERMINES IN ITS SOLE DISCRETION THAT IT IS UNABLE, OR IT IS ECONOMICALLY NOT FEASIBLE, TO CONVEY GOOD AND MARKETABLE TITLE TO THE PROPERTY INSURABLE BY THE TITLE COMPANY, OR ANOTHER REPUTABLE TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, AT REGULAR RATES, AT THE CLOSING DATE, AND THE CLOSING DATE IS NOT EXTENDED OR OTHERWISE AMENDED AS SET FORTH ELSEWHERE IN THIS AGREEMENT (OR BY SELLER IN ITS SOLE AND ABSOLUTE DISCRETION), OR (D) DETERMINES, IN ITS SOLE DISCRETION TO TERMINATE THE AGREEMENT AND DEEM THE AGREEMENT NULL AND VOID, IF REQUIRED BY APPLICABLE LAW, AND/OR IF REQUIRED BY ANY EXISTING CONTRACT OR AGREEMENT BINDING UPON SELLER AND/OR THE PROPERTY, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY AGREEMENTSWITH THE PRIOR OWNER OF THE PROPERTY, ANY MORTGAGE INSURER OR ANY MORTGAGE BROKER, THEN SELLER MAY TERMINATE THIS AGREEMENT BY WRITTEN NOTICE TO BUYER AND THE ESCROW/CLOSING AGENT.

While you take care of that situation I'll educate myself on the species of ducks and back away from the television.:-)

Once again you're unable to get your facts straight.Why would I google it and trust some random article on the Internet (probably put out by an unscrupulous broker like yourself) that has no basis and isn't substantiated with hard data.