Stewart, who is extremely charismatic the rest of the time, keeps putting out challenges with a somewhat nasty edge to them - he "can tell" that the people who were active traders before they signed up for the class are going to "fail" - "fail" being WIA-speak for "not pay between $10,000 and $71,000 to continue their training with WIA" - because of their preconceived notions; if you don't proceed with the training, "you don't belong here," "[trading] is not for you" and you never should have signed up for the present class in the first place, and so on.additionally, on the first day of the class Stewart said there would be prizes the next day for people who went home that night and succeeded in getting the limits on their credit cards raised to $15,000.00. while presented in the guise of sound financial advice - Stewart said that not having your cards maxed out will instantly raise your credit score - this particular piece of advice seemed to come out of left field, as it was in no way related to any of the rest of the class material, but Stewart made it sound like good advice, so i followed it. my girlfriend, however, found someone's comment online saying that the real reason we were admonished to do this is so we could pay for the advanced training. this seemed a little unlikely to me at first, but the more i thought about it, the more obvious the truth of it became. this is a class very specifically on stock trading - it's not about how to improve your credit rating or your financial standing in any other way. so where did this piece of advice - and the other one, that students should apply for a new credit card through a credit card-finder link provided by the instructor (who flat-out lied in his denial that applying for too many credit cards could have a *negative* impact on one's credit rating, which it most certainly can) - come from?

So for me at that time it worked.

Because there's about a ZERO percent chance that I'm ever going to understand tax stuff as well as a CPA, and it can be months or years in between things like a rent loss carryover leading to a $60k paper loss on a sale that actually netted $300k type situation.So, for me at least, it's just as much knowing what I don't know, and calling the CPA to educate me, as it is what I do know.

Here is the story:The first time the hot water issue was encountered, the lady called me at 7:45 PM telling me that she has no hot water.

Tenants haven't had time to make a substantial dent in your loan, and closing fees will eat up any meat on the bone.So, let's assume we're all talking about long-term exit strategies, 15-20 years down the line when tenants have bought you 60-80% of a house (depending on loan term and accelerated pay down, etc).

Please contact me at ron(at)homeresolutionservices(dot)com and i will connect you with their office.Ron

Not enough meat on bone to justify price of cost segregation until you get to about 500k properties.2.

Feel free to contact me at anytime to bounce off some ideas/info regarding the El Paso market. - Adrian

At that price, there just isn't any meat on the bones to do a quality renovation.

The line because a lot lesser clear because, for me at least, I feel that they will have a better idea of what I expect so I don't communicate it as well.