House-hacking is a great choice, but usually with a higher buy-in in areas you'd want to live (Midtown and Medical District have a lot of these types of units). 

90% occupancy, that’ll definitely cover the note and expenses (assuming you bought right).Nice might be right for you’re choice of living conditions, but not always the right choice for your investments.

You could sell a few of the lower performing properties or in the worst locations and roll that into a larger MF deal that us professionally managed. 

Example:  If you have a choice between paying $100k for a property or 20k and leveraging $80k, you are far better off only spending $20k.Numbers:  $20k down = $200/m or $2400/yr; $100k down = $400/m or $4800/yr.Buy 2 properties using $20k down for each and you have the same cash flow as the $100k DP option. 

You also have to be concerned about debt to income ratios as second loans usually carry higher interest rates and shorter terms (think larger payments). 

Of course, there will be a premium attached for their work, and you can expect to pay cash or equivalent (hard money or line or credit), but this is still a great choice for someone who doesn't want to (or can't afford to) do all the work of marketing to find motivated sellers.

If it's a larger organization, feel free to inquire about their different staff qualifications.2.

@Paniz Kosarianfard I have a client that moved from Dallas to the Bay Area and I don't think the Bay Area would be my top choice.

If everything goes smoothly, then I may feel it easier to put trust in him on larger projects on the property, if they were to come up.Let me know, thanks everyone!

However if the roles were reversed, I would feel quite insulted that you feel, I as a seller can't make my own choices.