LCDs are better (for me at least) but you have to keep them clean.

The profitability for me at least is almost as much so it's a no brainer...

It would be a match up.hot dogs vs hamburger.bread vs frosted flakes.a pound of butter vs a pile of miracle whip.fajita meat vs chicken breasts.etc.I'd take a picture and post these food competitions on the web and people would vote on what gets eaten first and what animal would eat it first. 

So I started "questioning" them on their education and a comprehensive understanding of things such as certain aspects of renovating a property, or keeping track of expenses to come up with how to calculate reserves, what to do with problem tenants.My thesis is correct, all of these guru trainings are like an introductory course you could take at a college and they have ZERO meat to the bone.

For me at this point, knowing when a property looks good enough (after the numbers work out using the rental property calculator) to put an offer in and pay an inspector is a challenge.

The guest called me at 10 p.m. because the lock wouldn't open.

They got me. At

:D haha..you guys made me laugh I didn't think you were hitting on me at all, Nick.

But I still needed to do further research after I spoke with someone who sounded African (ethnic accent) and Mr Morgan was messaging me at 1a.m. not normal business hours.

Stewart, who is extremely charismatic the rest of the time, keeps putting out challenges with a somewhat nasty edge to them - he "can tell" that the people who were active traders before they signed up for the class are going to "fail" - "fail" being WIA-speak for "not pay between $10,000 and $71,000 to continue their training with WIA" - because of their preconceived notions; if you don't proceed with the training, "you don't belong here," "[trading] is not for you" and you never should have signed up for the present class in the first place, and so on.additionally, on the first day of the class Stewart said there would be prizes the next day for people who went home that night and succeeded in getting the limits on their credit cards raised to $15,000.00. while presented in the guise of sound financial advice - Stewart said that not having your cards maxed out will instantly raise your credit score - this particular piece of advice seemed to come out of left field, as it was in no way related to any of the rest of the class material, but Stewart made it sound like good advice, so i followed it. my girlfriend, however, found someone's comment online saying that the real reason we were admonished to do this is so we could pay for the advanced training. this seemed a little unlikely to me at first, but the more i thought about it, the more obvious the truth of it became. this is a class very specifically on stock trading - it's not about how to improve your credit rating or your financial standing in any other way. so where did this piece of advice - and the other one, that students should apply for a new credit card through a credit card-finder link provided by the instructor (who flat-out lied in his denial that applying for too many credit cards could have a *negative* impact on one's credit rating, which it most certainly can) - come from?