We aimed for $100+ positive cash flow or better on each home.

You then get a depreciation deduction and if the cash flow is then positive, you are taxed on that income.

...Positive or negative impact?

Construction workers, and investors, can change on the drop of a dime depending on their financial position.

Keep systematically working to get that first deal under your belt and stay positive.

No developer is in business to hold property any longer than he/she has to unless there are reasons to do so that will positively affect their bottom line.

Unless there's something very local that makes this property more attractive OR it really is cash flow positive once you consider all expenses, I'd sell it in a heartbeat.

Let them off the hook for the deficiency judgment, and let them get on with the life they could afford.I daresay most people in this position knew exactly what was happening when they took these loans.

You could start there, but your equity position for the work is not very compelling.

Also, homeowners in default vacate their houses for any reason they see fit...mostly because they are done caring about the property...they have to leave anyways, why not move on with their life before they bank evicts them.It is also no concern of the investor why the homeowner chooses to move out.If you can swing it timing wise it is a good deal for several reasons...the house doesn't sit vacant....you have somebody living in it that knows the deal (you disclose to them exactly what is happening and charge them a monthly rent below market value)...they can show the house for you if need be...the utilities get paid...and the investor can make some positive cash flow while negotiating...let's stop pretending this is hurting anybody...and most of all...dont make me think for a second we are concerned about the lender losing money because the investor is profiting....its the homeowner in default on the hook and nobody else.